Similar to other states attempting to pass gun control laws, California has been at the forefront of this movement for years. In a recent law passed in California, “high capacity” magazines of more than 10 rounds were banned. For many gun owners in California, this limited them to smaller magazines than that of the industry standards. Because of the ban, gun rights groups took this one to court in California and they won.
U.S. News reported,
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out a California law banning high-capacity ammunition magazines, ruling that the measure violates citizens’ constitutionally protected right to bear arms.
‘California’s law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense … Its scope is so sweeping that half of all magazines in American are now unlawful to own in California,’ Lee wrote in the ruling.
The ruling was a split 2-1 decision, with Chief U.S District Court Judge Barbara Lynn, the third judge on the appellate panel, dissenting.”
Gun Rights Upheld
There are two important stories in this ruling. The first being that the restriction of ‘high capacity’ rounds was overturned. At the core of the majority’s argument was the definition of “large capacity.” Because the state had declared the national standard size for most magazines as “large capacity,” they banned the most popular firearms on the market. This was a plain form of backdoor gun control.
The court decided that the terminology was essentially too expansive and that the law would make criminals out of many law abiding gun owners for simply owning the standard-sized magazines. The court declared that the law’s scope was so sweeping that half of all magazines in America were unlawful to own in California.
Related Article: NY & DC Attorney Generals File Lawsuits Against NRA
If we look back at the Supreme Court’s Heller precedent, what matters is whether a weapon is in common usage or not. Lee’s opinion points out the enormous number of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds in circulation in the U.S. Additionally, Lee shows there is historical context too, with even some antique weapons capable of firing more than 10 rounds.
The 9th Circuit Votes In Favor Of Gun Rights
The second story here is that the 9th Circuit, a historically liberal and anti-gun court, has voted in favor of gun rights. One of President Trump’s and Mitch McConnell’s claim to first term success has been the number of federal appointed judges that have been confirmed.
The President with the most appointees on the 9th Circuit who are active right now is Trump, with 10. The two judges who made up today’s majority were a Bush 43 appointee and a Trump appointee, Kenneth Lee.
These appointees could usher in a new era for gun rights in America. If a historically anti-gun federal court like the 9th circuit is tearing down gun laws and handing victories to gun rights advocates, everything is now on the table.
Hopefully this means that gun rights cases will get a fairer hearing, and possibly more frequent favorable outcomes for years to come.
Related Article: Subway Bans Open Carry Firearms in Restaurants